<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brand Tags: Crowdsourcing human perception of brands</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lavarow.com/2008/05/23/brand-tags-crowdsourcing-human-perception-of-brands/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lavarow.com/2008/05/23/brand-tags-crowdsourcing-human-perception-of-brands/</link>
	<description>Lava Row is a social media consulting, strategy and education firm based in Des Moines, Iowa.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:22:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indie</title>
		<link>http://www.lavarow.com/2008/05/23/brand-tags-crowdsourcing-human-perception-of-brands/#comment-388</link>
		<dc:creator>Indie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lavarow.com/2008/05/23/brand-tags-crowdsourcing-human-perception-of-brands/#comment-388</guid>
		<description>It really does give a unique snapshot of public perception, albeit a limited one. The drawback about a voluntary, web-based pool is that it tends to attract people who have already invested in some way. But for companies with investment in web infrastructure, tech companies and the like, it should be made required reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really does give a unique snapshot of public perception, albeit a limited one. The drawback about a voluntary, web-based pool is that it tends to attract people who have already invested in some way. But for companies with investment in web infrastructure, tech companies and the like, it should be made required reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indie</title>
		<link>http://www.lavarow.com/2008/05/23/brand-tags-crowdsourcing-human-perception-of-brands/#comment-1820</link>
		<dc:creator>Indie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lavarow.com/2008/05/23/brand-tags-crowdsourcing-human-perception-of-brands/#comment-1820</guid>
		<description>It really does give a unique snapshot of public perception, albeit a limited one. The drawback about a voluntary, web-based pool is that it tends to attract people who have already invested in some way. But for companies with investment in web infrastructure, tech companies and the like, it should be made required reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really does give a unique snapshot of public perception, albeit a limited one. The drawback about a voluntary, web-based pool is that it tends to attract people who have already invested in some way. But for companies with investment in web infrastructure, tech companies and the like, it should be made required reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cale Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.lavarow.com/2008/05/23/brand-tags-crowdsourcing-human-perception-of-brands/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>Cale Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 21:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lavarow.com/2008/05/23/brand-tags-crowdsourcing-human-perception-of-brands/#comment-360</guid>
		<description>Hey Nathan - 

Happy Friday.

I saw this also and thought about it. Although I&#039;m not sure I would consider this &#039;leveling&#039; the playing field so much - sometimes I feel like things like &#039;brand tags&#039; are too easy for corporations to write off.

I imagine Google results tend to have a bigger impact. But you would know better - in your adventures promoting social media, is it getting harder for companies to ignore?

I would assume yes. I would hope yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Nathan &#8211; </p>
<p>Happy Friday.</p>
<p>I saw this also and thought about it. Although I&#8217;m not sure I would consider this &#8216;leveling&#8217; the playing field so much &#8211; sometimes I feel like things like &#8216;brand tags&#8217; are too easy for corporations to write off.</p>
<p>I imagine Google results tend to have a bigger impact. But you would know better &#8211; in your adventures promoting social media, is it getting harder for companies to ignore?</p>
<p>I would assume yes. I would hope yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cale Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.lavarow.com/2008/05/23/brand-tags-crowdsourcing-human-perception-of-brands/#comment-1819</link>
		<dc:creator>Cale Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 21:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lavarow.com/2008/05/23/brand-tags-crowdsourcing-human-perception-of-brands/#comment-1819</guid>
		<description>Hey Nathan - 

Happy Friday.

I saw this also and thought about it. Although I&#039;m not sure I would consider this &#039;leveling&#039; the playing field so much - sometimes I feel like things like &#039;brand tags&#039; are too easy for corporations to write off.

I imagine Google results tend to have a bigger impact. But you would know better - in your adventures promoting social media, is it getting harder for companies to ignore?

I would assume yes. I would hope yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Nathan &#8211; </p>
<p>Happy Friday.</p>
<p>I saw this also and thought about it. Although I&#8217;m not sure I would consider this &#8216;leveling&#8217; the playing field so much &#8211; sometimes I feel like things like &#8216;brand tags&#8217; are too easy for corporations to write off.</p>
<p>I imagine Google results tend to have a bigger impact. But you would know better &#8211; in your adventures promoting social media, is it getting harder for companies to ignore?</p>
<p>I would assume yes. I would hope yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

