Lava Row is a social media consulting, strategy and education firm
in Des Moines, Iowa. These are our adventures.
  • Brand Tags: Crowdsourcing human perception of brands
    May 23rd, 2008 / Posted by Nathan T. Wright

    Brand TagsLast week I discovered an interesting project called Brand Tags (Brandtags.net), a website that lets visitors “tag” globally-recognized brands like Coca-Cola, Microsoft, GE, etc.

    Tagging is a common function built into peer-to-peer social networks and web-based applications. For example, while watching YouTube videos or looking at photos on Flickr, you may notice a cluster of descriptive words to the right. Those are “tags” that the user has added to help categorize where the video belongs. Brand Tags works in a similar fashion, except that you tag based on your perception (not categorization) of the brands.

    Brand Tags is fascinating because it gives us a window into the collective mind of hundreds of thousands of people and how they currently perceive large companies — companies that spend billions of dollars to shape our perceptions.

    Below are a couple examples of brands and their corresponding tags:

    Brand: Apple
    Tags: Cool, Design, Awesome, Innovation
    http://www.brandtags.net/browse.php?id=72

    Brand: MySpace
    Tags: Annoying, Friends, Music, Kids, Teenagers, Ugly
    http://www.brandtags.net/browse.php?id=41

    Brand: Google
    Tags: Search, Everything, God, Evil
    http://www.brandtags.net/browse.php?id=2

    Brand: McDonald’s
    Tags: Cheap, Fat, Food, Unhealthy
    http://www.brandtags.net/browse.php?id=47

    The Brand Tags project is just another example of how social mediums have leveled the playing field between large organizations and their consumers.

    Bookmark and Share

View Comments to “Brand Tags: Crowdsourcing human perception of brands”

  1. Hey Nathan –

    Happy Friday.

    I saw this also and thought about it. Although I’m not sure I would consider this ‘leveling’ the playing field so much – sometimes I feel like things like ‘brand tags’ are too easy for corporations to write off.

    I imagine Google results tend to have a bigger impact. But you would know better – in your adventures promoting social media, is it getting harder for companies to ignore?

    I would assume yes. I would hope yes.

  2. It really does give a unique snapshot of public perception, albeit a limited one. The drawback about a voluntary, web-based pool is that it tends to attract people who have already invested in some way. But for companies with investment in web infrastructure, tech companies and the like, it should be made required reading.

Leave a Reply

blog comments powered by Disqus

Subscribe

Subscribe to our
RSS feed



Enter your email address to get updates in your inbox:

Recent Comments

The Lava Row team

Nathan T. Wright
Social media strategist, founder, public speaker.
Read my full bio >


Hillary Brown
Online community evangelist,
pop culturist.
Read my full bio >
Lava Row on Facebook

How Business Gets Done


I am thrilled to be a contributing author to How Business Gets Done! You can pick up a copy at Lulu.com.

Recent Videos

Loading
Loading Viddler Videos

    Powered By Viddler